Protecting Democracy in times of Autocratization and Polarization
This research and policy advice project aims to identify international strategies and development policy options that protect and promote democracy, social cohesion and peace. To achieve this, it explores the patterns and typical dynamics of autocratization and democratization processes in countries of the Global South and how these are related to polarization and social cohesion dynamics. We prominently analyse the interplay of domestic factors with international ones. On the one hand, the project focuses on the possibilities and limits of international cooperation, especially within the realm of development policy to counteract, halt and possibly reverse trends towards autocratization and polarization. Secondly, the project addresses the question of how development policy strategies and measures can potentially promote and strengthen autocratization and polarization processes and discusses which and how elements of the strategies and measures need to be adapted in these contexts to minimize these risks. All mentioned topics are examined in two dimensions of reality (offline and online).
Project Lead:
Julia Leininger
Armin von Schiller
Project Team:
Anita Breuer
Charlotte Fiedler
Karina Mross
Daniel Nowack
Semuhi Sinanoglu
Christopher Wingens
Financing:
Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ)
Time frame:
2024 - 2026
/
ongoing
Project description
For several years now, global autocratization trends have posed an increasingly fundamental threat to the liberal world order, social peace and development cooperation. Over 70% of the world's population now live in autocratic regimes, and the trend is rising. Social cohesion is eroding, leading to an increase in violent conflicts of various kinds. At the same time, democracy as a mechanism for the peaceful and respectful resolution of social tensions is being questioned in many countries, if not explicitly attacked. Internally, autocrats use social polarization and mobilize along exclusionary identities and discriminatory narratives as a strategy to advance or consolidate autocratization in their countries. These developments are usually insidious and undermine democratic institutions and processes, such as government accountability. Although in many places protests and social movements are resisting these anti-democratic tendencies in many countries, they often fail to be effective due to the power of the state apparatus.
Global and transnational dynamics reinforce these domestic tendencies. Economically successful autocracies such as China or Russia advertise their political model and actively promote it abroad. They spread anti-pluralist norms, stabilize dictatorships and attack democratic institutions, also and increasingly through digital means.
The global trends towards autocratization and polarization are framework conditions that restrict the available options for development policy. They not only impede and prevent the achievement of development goals, but also jeopardize the global and domestic common good, social cohesion and peace.
The research project aims to identify international strategies and development policy options that protect and promote democracy, social cohesion and peace. To achieve this, it explores the patterns and typical dynamics of autocratization and democratization processes and how these relate to polarization and social cohesion dynamics.The interplay of domestic factors with international ones is prominently analysed. On the one hand, the project focuses on the possibilities and limits of international, especially development policy cooperation in contexts of autocratization and polarization. The influence of autocracy promotion also plays a role in the contexts examined.
Secondly, the project addresses the question of how development policy strategies and measures promote and strengthen autocratization and polarization processes and which and how elements of the strategies and measures need to be adapted in these contexts to minimize risk of unintended effects of interventions.
The research and policy advice project aims to answer the following overarching questions and examines these in two dimensions of reality (offline and online).
- What patterns (institutional reforms/actor strategies/digitalization) do autocratization and polarization processes and successful re-democratization processes exhibit?
- How do autocratization processes affect peace? Are certain contexts particularly prone to the outbreak of violence?
- Which inter- and transnational strategies contribute to the protection of democracy and promote active depolarization and social cohesion? (intended effects)
- How can development policy measures be actively prevented from promoting/driving autocratization and polarization? (unintended effects)
The research project comprises four work packages (WP): WP0 deals with overarching questions and brings together the findings from the topic-specific work packages. WP 1-3 focus on specific policy areas. WP 4 deals explicitly with questions on digitalization and links the other WPs as a cross-cutting topic.
- Work package 1: Protecting democracy and promoting social cohesion
- Work package 2: Strengthening state institutions (in particular public administration) as an instrument for promoting and protecting democracy
- Work package 3: Social peace, protests and autocratization
- Work package 4: Digitalization, disinformation and autocratization
Publications
-
Democracy promotion in times of autocratization: a conceptual note
Grimm, Sonja / Brigitte Weiffen / Karina Mross (2025)
in: Democratization (32/7), 1617-1639 -
Strategic responses to autocratization in international democracy promotion
Leininger, Julia / Karina Mross / Jonas Wolff (2025)
in: Democratization 32 (7), 1640-1662 -
Digital drivers of autocratisation: the role of information pollution in polarisation and democratic backsliding in Mexico
Breuer, Anita (2025)
in: Journal of Politics in Latin America, first published 01.07.2025 -
From polarisation to autocratisation: the role of information pollution in Brazil's democratic erosion
Breuer, Anita (2025)
Discussion Paper 2/2025 -
Countering information pollution to protect democracy
Sinanoglu, Semuhi / Anita Breuer (2024)
Policy Brief 29/2024 -
Information integrity and information pollution: vulnerabilities and impact on social cohesion and democracy in Mexico
Breuer, Anita (2024)
Discussion Paper 2/2024 -
The impact of shock-responsive social cash transfers: evidence from an aggregate shock in Kenya
Strupat, Christoph / Emmanuel Nshakira-Rukundo / Arndt Reichert (2024)
Ruhr Economic Papers 1073, Essen: RWI Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung -
Strengthening social cohesion to mitigate human insecurity: Promise and peril
Leininger, Julia / Armin von Schiller / Charlotte Fiedler (2024)
in: Human Development Report 2023-24, Breaking the gridlock: reimagining cooperation in a polarized world, New York: UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), 163-166 -
Migration and the Racialisation of Space
Jaji, Rose (2024)
Bonn: German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), The Current Column of 18 March 2024 -
Urbanisation and social cohesion: theory and empirical evidence from Africa
Sakketa, Tekalign Gutu (2023)
Discussion Paper 16/2023 -
What do we know about how armed conflict affects social cohesion? A review of the empirical literature
Fiedler, Charlotte (2023)
in: International Studies Review 25 (3), viad030 -
Social cohesion and firms’ access to finance in Africa
Walle, Yabibal M. (2023)
in: Social Indicators Research 167, 27-46 -
Strengthening social cohesion in conflict-affected societies: potential, patterns and pitfalls
Cox, Fletcher D. / Charlotte Fiedler / Karina Mross (2023)
Policy Brief 3/2023 -
How does globalisation affect social cohesion?
Vrolijk, Kasper (2023)
Discussion Paper 5/2023 -
Can integrated social protection programmes affect social cohesion? Mixed-methods evidence from Malawi
Burchi, Francescco / Federico Roscioli (2022)
in: European Journal of Development Research, 34 (3), 1240 - 1263 -
Policy responses to COVID-19: why social cohesion and social protection matter in Africa
Leininger, Julia / Armin von Schiller / Christoph Strupat / Daniele Malerba (2022)
Discussion Paper 20/2022 -
Determinants of social cohesion: cross-country evidence
Walle, Yabibal M. (2022)
Discussion Paper 18/2022 -
Inequality and social cohesion in Africa: theoretical insights and an exploratory empirical investigation
Burchi, Francesco / Gabriela Zapata-Román (2022)
Discussion Paper 16/2022 -
Social cohesion and firms’ access to finance in Africa
Walle, Yabibal M. (2022)
Discussion Paper 9/2022 -
More than the sum of its parts: donor-sponsored cash-for-work programmes and social cohesion in Jordanian communities hosting Syrian refugees
Zintl, Tina / Markus Loewe (2022)
The European Journal of Development Research, 34 (3), 1320 - 1357 -
Disentangling the relationship between social protection and social cohesion: introduction to the special issue
Burchi, Francesco / Markus Loewe / Daniele Malerba / Julia Leininger (2022)
in: European Journal of Development Research, 34 (3), 1195 - 1215 -
The preserving effect of social protection on social cohesion in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from Kenya
Strupat, Christoph (2021)
Discussion Paper 33/2021 -
Social cohesion: a new definition and a proposal for its measurement in Africa
Leininger, Julia / Francesco Burchi / Charlotte Fiedler / Karina Mross / Daniel Nowack / Armin von Schiller / Christoph Sommer / Christoph Strupat / Sebastian Ziaja (2021)
Discussion Paper 31/2021 -
Can integrated social protection programmes affect social cohesion? Mixed-methods evidence from Malawi
Burchi, Francesco / Federico Roscioli (2021)
Discussion Paper 3/2021 -
Gradual, cooperative, coordinated: effective support for peace and democracy in conflict-affected states
Fiedler, Charlotte / Jörn Grävingholt / Julia Leininger / Karina Mross (2020)
in: International Studies Perspectives 21 (1), 54-77 -
The role of values for social cohesion: theoretical explication and empirical exploration
Nowack, Daniel / Sophia Schoderer (2020)
Discussion Paper 6/2020 -
Revenue collection and social policies: their underestimated contribution to social cohesion
Burchi, Francesco / Christoph Strupat / Armin von Schiller (2020)
Briefing Paper 1/2020 -
Steuer- und Sozialpolitik: ein unterschätzter Beitrag zur sozialen Kohäsion
Burchi, Francesco / Armin von Schiller / Christoph Strupat (2020)
Analysen und Stellungnahmen 4/2020 -
A comparative analysis of tax system in the BRICs and the challenges ahead: informality and the fiscal contract
Seelkopf, Laura / Armin von Schiller (2020)
in: Santiago López-Cariboni (ed.) / Editor-in-chief: Edward D. Mansfield / Nita Rudra, The Political Economy of the BRICS Countries, Volume 3: Political economy of informality in BRIC countries, London: World Scientific Publishing, 31-51 -
Social cohesion and economic development: unpacking the relationship
Sommer, Christoph (2019)
Briefing Paper 16/2019 -
What do we know about post-conflict transitional justice from academic research: key insights for practitioners
Fiedler, Charlotte / Karina Mross (2019)
Briefing Paper 3/2019 -
Linking social protection schemes: the joint effects of a public works and a health insurance programme in Ethiopia
Shigute, Zemzem / Christoph Strupat / Francesco Burchi / Getnet Alemu / Arjun S. Bedi (2019)
in: The Journal of Development Studies 56 (2), 431-448 -
First peace, then democracy? Evaluating strategies of international support at critical junctures after civil war
Mross, Karina (2019)
in: International Peacekeeping 26 (2), 190-215 -
Addressing food insecurity and agricultural production under a changing climate context in Nigeria
Chinedum, Nwajiuba / Chinwe Ifejika Speranza (2011)
Perspectives: Political analysis and commentary from Africa (Heinrich Böll Foundation publication series) -
Cash transfers and food security in Sub‐Saharan Africa
Burchi, Francesco / Giorgio D'Agostino / Luca Pieroni / Margherita Scarlato (2018)
in: South African Journal of Economics Volume 86 (4), 383-400 -
Cultural values, attitudes, and democracy promotion in Malawi: how values mediate the effectiveness of donor support for the reform of presidential term limits and family law
Nowack, Daniel (2018)
Discussion Paper 27/2018 -
Cultural values, popular attitudes and democracy promotion: how values mediate the effectiveness of donor support for term limits and LGBT+ rights in Uganda
Hulse, Merran (2018)
Discussion Paper 26/2018 -
Unbundling the impacts of economic empowerment programmes: evidence from Malawi
Burchi, Francesco / Christoph Strupat (2018)
Discussion Paper 32/2018 -
Linking small-scale farmers to the durum wheat value chain in Ethiopia: assessing the effects on production and wellbeing
Biggeri, Mario / Francesco Burchi / Federico Ciani / Raoul Herrmann (2018)
in: Food Policy 79 (August), 77-91
Events
Social protection and social cohesion
Social protection for social cohesion
Taxation, inequality and social cohesion
Contributing to Social Cohesion Through Development Cooperation