The EU’s negotiation of narratives and policies on African migration 1999-2019

Schöfberger, Irene
External Publications (2019)

in: European Foreign Affairs Review 24 (4), 513–532

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2019040
Information

The European Union (EU) has been struggling to find a shared course on African migration since the entry into force of the Schengen Agreement (1995). It has done so through two interrelated processes of negotiation. To begin, parties have negotiated internal and external migration policies. In addition, they have negotiated narrative frames about migration and whether migration should be interpreted rather as an opportunity or as a threat. In times in which narrative frames increasingly shape policy negotiations, it becomes very important to analyse how policymakers negotiate narrative frames on migration and how these shape policy responses. However, such an analysis is still missing. This article investigates how the negotiation of EU policies on African migration from 1999 until 2019 has been influenced by a  simultaneous process of negotiation of narrative frames on migration. It does so based on policy analysis and interviews with European and African policymakers. It finds two major trends in EU negotiation processes: migration-security narratives have strengthened national-oriented approaches, and migration-development narratives have strengthened transnational-oriented approaches. The two approaches have always been interlinked. However, in the last years, security-oriented national approaches have increasingly influenced development-oriented transnational approaches.

Further experts

Altenburg, Tilman

Economic Geography 

Asimeng, Emmanuel Theodore

Urban Planning, Sustainability 

El-Haddad, Amirah

Economy 

Loewe, Markus

Economy 

Sommer, Christoph

Economist 

Sowa, Alina

Economics 

Strohmaier, Rita

Economy 

Stöcker, Alexander

Economics 

Vogel, Tim

Economy 

Vrolijk, Kasper

Economy 

Zintl, Tina

Political Scientist