Political Futures in Climate Scenarios (PoliClim)
Political institutions are a key factor for the success of global sustainability policy, yet they are only limitedly considered quantitatively in current climate and sustainability scenarios. PoliClim contributes to cloing this gap by further developing political science models and linking them with REMIND, the influential integrated climate-economic model of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK).
Project Lead:
Julia Leininger
Project Team:
Christopher Wingens
Financing:
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
Time frame:
2026 - 2028
/
ongoing
Co-operation Partner:
Project description
Realistic long-term scenarios are necessary to effectively combat climate change. Current quantitative scenarios generated with so-called Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) focus heavily on techno-economic factors. Political factors, such as the quality of state institutions, play only a secondary role. However, institutional challenges have recently been identified as one of the greatest concerns for the feasibility of climate and sustainability scenarios, as highlighted in the latest report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
PoliClim addresses this gap. In this joint project by IDOS and PIK, political science concepts and data are systematically linked with climate modeling. The project investigates how political institutions – through factors such as the rule of law and institutional capacity – influence the transformation toward sustainability as either “enablers” or “barriers”. In doing so, PoliClim makes a decisive contribution to the scientific foundation and realism of future scenarios. It aims to contribute to a more reliable foundation for decision-making in international climate policy, as called for in the latest IPCC reports.
The project pursues three central objectives:
- Refinement of scenario narratives: Existing climate scenarios (Shared Socioeconomic Pathways, SSPs) are refined based on political science concepts of the rule of law, institutional capacity, and accountability.
- Development of a dynamic institutional model to project future development paths of political institutions worldwide until the year 2100.
- Model integration: Definition of interfaces to link these political projections with PIK’s IAM model REMIND and investigate their influence on transformation dynamics, such as investment conditions for renewable energy.
Publications
-
Three foci at the science-policy interface for systemic Sustainable Development Goal acceleration
Pradhan, Prajal / Nina Weitz / Vassilis Daioglou / [...] / Julia Leininger / [...] / Christopher Wingens et al. (2024)
in: Nature Communications 15, article 8600 -
Defining a sustainable development target space for 2030 and 2050
van Vuuren, Detlef P. / Caroline Zimm / Sebastian Busch et al. (2022)
in: One Earth 5 (2), 142-156 -
A sustainable development pathway for climate action within the UN 2030 Agenda
Soergel, Bjoern et al. (2021)
in: Nature Climate Change 11 (8), 656–664 -
Innovations for sustainability: pathways to an efficient and sufficient post-pandemic future
Nakicenovic, Nebojsa et al. (2020)
3rd report prepared by The World in 2050 Initiative (TWI2050), Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis