Supporting Sustainable Peace
The DIE research project “Supporting Sustainable Peace” took a closer look at how countries emerging from civil war can be supported on their paths towards sustainable peace. It was conducted from 2015 to 2018 and financed by the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development. The project consisted of three main work streams analyzing both international and domestic factors’ effect on peace.
Project Lead:
Jörn Grävingholt
Project Team:
Charlotte Fiedler
Karina Mross
Financing:
Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ)
Time frame:
2015 - 2018
/
completed
Project description
The DIE research project “Supporting Sustainable Peace” took a closer look at how countries emerging from civil war can be supported on their paths towards sustainable peace. It was conducted from 2015 to 2018 and financed by the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development. The project consisted of three main work streams analyzing both international and domestic factors’ effect on peace.
The first workstream provides novel insights into the effectiveness of international peacebuilding support. It analyzed the interplay of the five main areas of peacebuilding (peacekeeping, non-military security support, support for politics and governance, for socio-economic development, and for societal conflict transformation). Core results of the first workstream include:
- International peacebuilding can make a difference, while post-conflict countries that receive no substantial international support are prone to experience conflict recurrence
- Peacekeeping is only one important component of effective post-conflict support
- Although democratization might sometimes have conflict inducing effects, international engagement aimed at building political institutions, democracy and governance can in fact contribute to peace after civil war
- Only combined international efforts across all types of support can address difficult contexts
The second workstream took a closer look at democracy support as one particularly debated type of international engagement in post-conflict countries, and demonstrates how post-conflict democracy support has to be designed to effectively foster peace. Some of the core findings include:
- Democracy support does not trigger conflict recurrence
- External democracy support that accompanies post-conflict democratisation can mitigate potential destabilizing effects, in particular when supporting both political competition and institutional constraints at the same time
- In contrast to widespread assumptions, prioritising stability over democracy is not less risk-prone than gradualist support for both goals
Finally, a third workstream studied the effect of domestic political institutions and institutional change in post-conflict countries, showing that specific types of political participation can increase countries’ chances to remain peaceful. More concretely, the research findings show that:
- It is possible to identify concrete, domestic political institutions that help make peace stick
- Post-conflict constitution-making can significantly increase countries’ chances to sustain peace. However, such processes need time and should not be rushed.
- While many warn of the dangers connected to national and regional elections, it can be shown that local elections can increase a country’s chances for peace
Publications
-
Democracy support and peaceful democratisation after civil war
Mross, Karina (2019)
Briefing Paper 7/2019 -
Why writing a new constitution after conflict can contribute to peace
Fiedler, Charlotte (2019)
Briefing Paper 11/2019 -
What do we know about post-conflict transitional justice from academic research: key insights for practitioners
Fiedler, Charlotte / Karina Mross (2019)
Briefing Paper 3/2019 -
First peace, then democracy? Evaluating strategies of international support at critical junctures after civil war
Mross, Karina (2019)
in: International Peacekeeping 26 (2), 190-215 -
Supporting peace after civil war: what kind of international engagement can make a difference?
Fiedler, Charlotte / Jörn Grävingholt / Karina Mross (2018)
Briefing Paper 23/2018 -
Post-conflict societies: chances for peace and types of international support
Fiedler, Charlotte / Karina Mroß (2017)
Briefing Paper 4/2017 -
Post-Konflikt-Gesellschaften: Chancen für den Frieden und Arten internationaler Unterstützung
Fiedler, Charlotte / Karina Mroß (2017)
Analysen und Stellungnahmen 5/2017 -
Frieden nachhaltig fördern: Erkenntnisse der Forschung zur Wirksamkeit von Post-Konflikt-Engagement
Fiedler, Charlotte / Karina Mroß / Jörn Grävingholt (2016)
Analysen und Stellungnahmen 5/2016 -
Building peace after war: the knowns and unknowns of external support to post-conflict societies
Fiedler, Charlotte / Karina Mroß / Jörn Grävingholt (2016)
Briefing Paper 11/2016 -
Regierungsnahe Milizen, Menschenrechtsverletzungen und die ambivalente Rolle der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit
Carey, Sabine C. / Neil J. Mitchell (2016)
Analysen und Stellungnahmen 4/2016 -
Pro-government militias, human rights abuses and the ambiguous role of foreign aid
Carey, Sabine C. / Neil J. Mitchell (2016)
Briefing Paper 4/2016 -
Bürgerkriegsausgang und dauerhafter Frieden: warum der Vorteil militärischer Siege überschätzt wird
Kreutz, Joakim (2016)
Analysen und Stellungnahmen 1/2016 -
Civil war outcomes and a durable peace: setting the record straight
Kreutz, Joakim (2015)
Briefing Paper 17/2015 -
Towers of strength in turbulent times? Assessing the effectiveness of international support to peace and democracy in Kenya and Kyrgyzstan in the aftermath of interethnic violence
Fiedler, Charlotte (2015)
Discussion Paper 6/2015 -
Burundi – on the brink of escalation?
Mroß, Karina (2015)
German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE) (The Current Column of 1 June 2015) -
The fragile road towards peace and democracy: insights on the effectiveness of international support to post-conflict Burundi
Mroß, Karina (2015)
Discussion Paper 3/2015 -
Conflicting objectives in democracy promotion: avoiding blueprint traps and incomplete democratic transitions
Leininger, Julia / Sebastian Ziaja (2014)
Briefing Paper 11/2014 -
Evaluating statebuilding support: learning from experience or judging from assumptions?
Grävingholt, Jörn / Julia Leininger (2014)
in: Ole Winckler Andersen / Beate Bull / Megan Kennedy-Chouane (eds.), Evaluation methodologies for aid in conflict, London: Routledge, 154-174 -
Struggling for stability: international support for peace and democracy in post-civil war Nepal
Grävingholt, Jörn / Lennart Bendfeldt / Linda Berk / Yvonne Blos / Charlotte Fiedler / Karina Mroß (2013)
Discussion Paper 27/2013 -
Contributing to democratic consolidation and sustainable peace in El Salvador and the Philippines: overcoming the quest for stability
Zulueta-Fülscher, Kimana (2013)
Discussion Paper 24/2013 -
Foreign aid and the fragile consensus on state fragility
Faust, Jörg / Jörn Grävingholt / Sebastian Ziaja (2013)
Discussion Paper 8/2013 -
Effectiveness of democracy-support in “fragile states”: a review
Zulueta-Fülscher, Kimana (2013)
Discussion Paper 1/2013 -
State fragility: towards a multi-dimensional empirical typology
Grävingholt, Jörn / Sebastian Ziaja / Merle Kreibaum (2012)
Discussion Paper 3/2012 -
From power struggles to sustainable peace: understanding political settlements
Brown, Stephen / Jörn Grävingholt (2011)
Paris: OECD (Conflict and Fragility publication series) -
State-building
Leininger, Julia (2009)
in: Dieter Nohlen / Rainer-Olaf Schultze (Hrsg.), Lexikon der Politikwissenschaft 2, 4. Aufl., München: Beck, 1034-1045 -
The convergence of peacebuilding and state building: addressing a common purpose from different perspectives
Grävingholt, Jörn / Stefan Gänzle / Sebastian Ziaja (2009)
Briefing Paper 4/2009
Events
Links
Project: An empirical typology of state fragility
Project: Transformation and development in fragile states