Externe Publikationen

Political inequality and impacts on climate mitigation: the case of Germany's energy sector

in: Applied Energy 393, article 125928

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125928
Open access

To meet the Paris Agreement's aim of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, there is an urgent need for countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by transitioning their energy sectors from fossil-based to zero‑carbon sources. Despite strong climate policies and gradual emissions reductions, Germany remains the greatest emitter in the European Union. Coal, responsible for almost 35 % of the country's CO2 emissions, is not scheduled to be phased out until 2038. Wind, one of Germany's greatest sources of renewable energy, has faced challenges due to a 1000 m federal ‘rule’ between residential buildings and wind turbines. The German coal phase-out and the onshore wind phase-in are linked to questions of procedural injustice in energy, as showcased in multiple studies. In this paper we develop a comprehensive framework that introduces the concept of political inequality as a lens to examine procedural injustice in energy transition decision-making, arguing that it offers greater nuance. We apply the framework to Germany's coal phase-out and onshore wind phase-in, asking how stakeholders in the German energy transition – i.e. the Energiewende - report political inequalities of voice, representation, treatment and influence in these decision-making processes, both at the federal level and in the state of North Rhine-Westphalia. We also explore how such inequality impacts climate mitigation in Germany's energy sector and whether it slows progress. Our findings from twenty-eight semi-structured interviews with German decision-makers, civil society and activists, highlight multiple reported inequalities in these processes that point to several procedural injustices in energy transition decision-making in Germany. However, while political inequalities can indeed slow progress on climate mitigation in the energy sector, the reverse may also materialise. Further research is needed to understand how the tension between political inequality and climate mitigation unfolds in the German energy sector and in the broader energy transition.

Über die IDOS-Autor*innen

Dombrowsky, Ines

Ökonomin

Faus Onbargi, Alexia

Energie- und Klimapolitik

Weitere IDOS-Expert*innen zu diesem Thema

Aleksandrova, Mariya

Climate risk governance 

Banerjee, Aparajita

Environmental and Resource Sociology, Public Policy 

Brandi, Clara

Ökonomie und Politikwissenschaft 

Büscher, Chris

Development studies / Political ecology 

Dippel, Beatrice

Komparatistik 

Donnelly, Aiveen

Politikwissenschaft 

Ekoh, Susan S.

Umweltwissenschaft 

Fuhrmann-Riebel, Hanna

Ökonomie 

Goedeking, Nicholas

Vergleichende politische Ökonomie 

Hagenström, Paul

Internationale Beziehungen 

Kativu, Saymore Ngonidzashe

Geographie 

Lehmann, Ina

Politikwissenschaft 

Malerba, Daniele

Ökonomie 

Mathis, Okka Lou

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Never, Babette

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Pegels, Anna

Ökonomin 

Rodríguez de Francisco, Jean Carlo

Ökologische Ökonomie 

Srigiri, Srinivasa Reddy

Agrarökonom 

Wagner, Niklas

Klima- und Wissenssoziologie 

Wende, Paulina

Politikwissenschaft 

Yi, HyunAh

Energie- und Umweltwissenschaften