Taxing carbon as an instrument of green industrial policy in developing countries

Bonn: German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)

ISBN: 978-3-96021-016-3
Preis: 6 €

Two simultaneous and interdependent issues challenge today’s development policy: poverty reduction and climate change. While economic growth is needed to tackle poverty reduction, governments need to set economic frameworks and incentive systems so that this growth remains within global environmental boundaries. When designed well, many of these measures can contribute to alleviating poverty and fostering competitiveness – that is, they can be used as green industrial policy measures.
This study focuses on carbon taxes as one possible green industrial policy instrument. It reviews existing evidence on competitiveness, employment and distributional effects with a view to informing the decisions of policymakers and bureaucrats in developing and emerging countries. To this aim, it pays particular attention to tax design options aimed at mediating negative and generating positive effects.
Carbon taxes have several advantages for developing and emerging countries. First and foremost, they provide a good tax base and raise revenues which in turn can be used to support social and economic aims. Their technical implementation is relatively easy and they send stable price signals, especially when compared to cap and trade schemes. Lastly, when formal and informal companies alike have to pay, carbon taxes reduce incentives for firms to remain in the informal sector.
Despite these advantages, only few developing and emerging countries have introduced or are considering introducing carbon taxes. One of the main reservations is the risk of negative impacts on economic and social aims. Ex post studies of competitiveness impacts in industrialised countries suggest that carbon or energy taxes have had neutral or even positive effects on competitiveness and gross domestic product (GDP). The studies also show that impacts depend crucially on the use of revenues.
To have similarly positive effects in developing countries, however, carbon taxes may have to be designed differently. After all, these countries have different administrative capacities, economic structures and abilities to adapt to carbon pricing. In particular, distributive and poverty effects need consideration as they impact on the optimal use of tax revenues. Tax revenues could, for example, be used for direct transfers or the cross-subsidisation of electricity lifeline tariffs to protect people living in poverty from the negative impacts of carbon pricing. Furthermore, empirical studies suggest that revenue recycling to subsidise basic goods, such as food, can have positive effects on poverty.

Über die Autorin

Pegels, Anna

Ökonomin

Weitere Expert*innen zu diesem Thema

Aleksandrova, Mariya

Climate risk governance 

Bauer, Steffen

Politikwissenschaftler 

Beck, Tanja

Politikwissenschaft 

Berensmann, Kathrin

Wirtschaftswissenschaften 

Brandi, Clara

Ökonomie und Politikwissenschaft 

Dippel, Beatrice

Komparatistik 

Ekoh, Susan S.

Umweltwissenschaft 

Haldenwang, Christian von

Politikwissenschaftler 

Hägele, Ramona

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Iacobuta, Gabriela

Climate and sustainable development policy 

Kativu, Saymore Ngonidzashe

Geographie 

Laudage Teles, Sabine

Ökonomie 

Lehmann, Ina

Politikwissenschaft 

Malerba, Daniele

Ökonomie 

Mathis, Okka Lou

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Rodríguez de Francisco, Jean Carlo

Ökologische Ökonomie 

Schiller, Armin von

Politikwissenschaftler 

Schraven, Benjamin

Politikwissenschaftler 

Sommer, Christoph

Ökonom 

Srigiri, Srinivasa Reddy

Agrarökonom 

Walle, Yabibal

Entwicklungsökonomie