A new contract for financing the UN development system: what does it mean and how can it be achieved?
Baumann, Max-Otto / Pratyush SharmaExterne Publikationen (2017)
in: Financing the UN Development System: pathways to reposition for Agenda 2030, Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation and the United Nations Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (UN MPTFO), 66-69
Follow the money’, goes the advice, for understanding any organisation. In the UN development system (UNDS), the bulk of member states’ contributions take a fairly ballistic course: launched with political fanfare, the money is aimed at the narrow landing place of a concrete project or purpose. 77% of development and humanitarian resources were earmarked in this way in 2015, ‘bilateralizing’ and bypassing the UNDS’ multilateral- and valueadding mechanisms. The three largest donors, accounting for 47%, also rely heavily on earmarking, and have thus practically cancelled the contract according to which the UNDS, like any other organistion, is (core-) funded to implement joint global agendas. Emerging donors are adapting the same transactional funding pattern for their South-South Cooperation.
Further IDOS experts
-
Berensmann, Kathrin
Economy
-
Fasold, Maximilian
Political Economy
-
Hackenesch, Christine
Political Science
-
Hilbrich, Sören
Economy
-
Janus, Heiner
Political Science
-
Keijzer, Niels
Social Science
-
Koch, Svea
Social Science
-
Mathis, Okka Lou
Political Scientist
-
Mchowa, Chifundo
Development Economics
-
Schwachula, Anna
Sociology
-
Sommer, Christoph
Economist
-
Srigiri, Srinivasa Reddy
Agricultural Economist
-
Vogel, Johanna
International Cultural Economy
-
von Haaren, Paula
Development Economics
-
Walle, Yabibal
Development Economics
-
Wehrmann, Dorothea
Sociology