From QCPR to corporate strategy? The 2030 Agenda and the UN development system
Mahn, Timo Casjen / Andreas GrantnerExterne Publikationen (2016)
published on SDG Knowledge Hub 24 October 2016
During the negotiations of the 2016 Quadrennial Comprehensive Policy Review (QCPR), UN Member States may want to consider lessons from the past. The QCPR is the key platform for debating the future of the UN Development System. However, after more than 30 years and 11 resolutions, the next round is at risk of looking like “business as usual,” without further reflection on what about the QCPR needs to be modernized. Member States will have to consider: What core function should the QCPR+ serve in the future? To whom is the annual QCPR resolution addressed? And how can implementation be ensured? This article makes the case for a transformation of the QCPR to a corporate strategy for the UN Development System.
Further IDOS experts
-
Baumann, Max-Otto
Political Science
-
Goedeking, Nicholas
Comparative Political Economy
-
Hackenesch, Christine
Political Science
-
Haug, Sebastian
Political Science
-
Hilbrich, Sören
Economy
-
Janus, Heiner
Political Science
-
Kachelmann, Matthias
Political Science
-
Keijzer, Niels
Social Science
-
Koch, Svea
Social Science
-
Li, Hangwei
Political Science
-
Mathis, Okka Lou
Political Scientist
-
Novoselova, Anna
Political Science
-
Nowack, Daniel
Political Science
-
Olekseyuk, Zoryana
Economy
-
Schwachula, Anna
Sociology
-
Srigiri, Srinivasa Reddy
Agricultural Economist
-
Stewart, Benjamin
Social Science
-
Vogel, Johanna
International Cultural Economy
-
Volz, Ulrich
Economist
-
von Haaren, Paula
Development Economics
-
Wehrmann, Dorothea
Sociology
-
Wingens, Christopher
Political Science