Poverty-energy-emissions pathways: recent trends and future sustainable development goals
Malerba, DanieleExternal Publications (2019)
in: Energy for Sustainable Development 49 (April ), 109-124
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2019.02.001
Information
How feasible is it to eradicate poverty by 2030, whilst tackling climate change? What would be the impact of poverty eradication on emission levels and needed mitigation rates? The question is crucial as it addresses the two most critical challenges of our time. Despite the necessity to address both issues simultaneously, a significant gap exists in the empirical literature as poverty and environmental outcomes, including both the level of emissions and energy use per capita, have been researched separately. While it has been shown that no country has achieved high human development with sustainable environmental consumption, more research is needed to link emissions and energy use with poverty directly.
This study aims to fill this gap by summarizing the existing literature and by estimating the poverty-energy-emissions pathway across countries and time using country level data from 149 countries, representing the majority of global emissions, energy use and poverty. The findings show that current poverty-energy-emission pathways can be approximated by a generalized logistic function, with extreme poverty eradication associated with relatively low levels of per capita emissions and energy use. Second, the analysis demonstrates that a weak decoupling process, between emission levels and poverty, has taken place in the last two decades. It also shows, however, that this decoupling process is less evident when energy use (rather than emissions) is considered. Finally, through a comparison of different scenarios, the study indicates that the eradication of global poverty by 2030 following the estimated pathways would mean an increase in emissions significantly higher compared to the case in which poverty is eradicated through targeted policies.
The study concludes by underlining the need for a stronger decoupling. Nonetheless given the difficulty of achieving further reductions in energy intensity, and the barriers for a complete de-carbonization of the energy system, alternative development approaches are also proposed.
Further IDOS experts
-
Aleksandrova, Mariya
Climate risk governance
-
Aleksandrova, Mariya
Climate risk governance
-
Bambe, Bao-We-Wal
Finance
-
Brandi, Clara
Ökonomie und Politikwissenschaft
-
Brandi, Clara
Economy and Political Science
-
Brüntrup, Michael
Agrarökonomie
-
Brüntrup, Michael
Agricultural Economy
-
Burchi, Francesco
Development Economy
-
Burchi, Francesco
Entwicklungsökonomie
-
Dippel, Beatrice
Comparatist
-
Dippel, Beatrice
Komparatistik
-
Donnelly, Aiveen
Politcal Science
-
Donnelly, Aiveen
Politikwissenschaft
-
Ekoh, Susan S.
Environmental Research
-
Ekoh, Susan S.
Umweltwissenschaft
-
Fuhrmann-Riebel, Hanna
Economy
-
Goedeking, Nicholas
Comparative Political Economy
-
Goedeking, Nicholas
Vergleichende politische Ökonomie
-
Hagenström, Paul
Internationale Beziehungen
-
Hagenström, Paul
International Relations
-
Kativu, Saymore Ngonidzashe
Geographie
-
Kativu, Saymore Ngonidzashe
Geography
-
Lehmann, Ina
Politikwissenschaft
-
Lehmann, Ina
Political Science
-
Mathis, Okka Lou
Political Scientist
-
Mathis, Okka Lou
Politikwissenschaftlerin
-
Mchowa, Chifundo
Development Economics
-
Mchowa, Chifundo
Entwicklungsökonomie
-
Mudimu, George Tonderai
Agrarpolitische Ökonomie
-
Mudimu, George Tonderai
Agricultural policy economics
-
Never, Babette
Political Scientist
-
Pegels, Anna
Economist
-
Rodríguez de Francisco, Jean Carlo
Ökologische Ökonomie
-
Rodríguez de Francisco, Jean Carlo
Ecological economics
-
Roost, Stefanie
Economics
-
Roost, Stefanie
Ökonomie
-
Srigiri, Srinivasa Reddy
Agrarökonom
-
Srigiri, Srinivasa Reddy
Agricultural Economist
-
Wagner, Niklas
Klima- und Wissenssoziologie
-
Wagner, Niklas
Climate & Knowledge Sociology
-
Yi, HyunAh
Energie- und Umweltwissenschaften
-
Yi, HyunAh
Energy and Environmental Policy