Climate impact auctions: an underused tool for green subsidies in the Global South
Matthey, Max Alexander / Aidan Hollis / Clara Brandi / Georg Kobiela / Benjamin Roth / Magdalene SilberbergerExterne Publikationen (2025)
in: Climate Policy, first published 15.02.2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2024.2411319
Open access
The urgency of reducing emissions globally requires the participation of Low- and Middle-Income Countries, which represent over 70% of global emissions. Funding from High-Income Countries’ support for a ‘just transition’ in developing countries through institutions such as the Green Climate Fund has almost exclusively been given as investment-cost subsidies. In contrast, the same industrialized countries extensively use performance-based mechanisms to drive emissions reductions domestically. We explore the advantages and disadvantages of using results-based subsidies allocated through reverse auctions as a tool to support mitigation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Results-based subsidies would drive strong responses by giving greater rewards for better performance. By reducing administrative discretion, results-based subsidies would decrease costs and facilitate participation by small- and medium-sized firms. Results-based subsidies would, however, increase capital costs and would reallocate risks from donors to project proponents. Overall, they could be attractive in specific circumstances, specifically for projects that can be competitive, have measurable results, and currently face socially suboptimal investment. Key policy insights:
- Low- and middle-income countries collectively are responsible for over 70% of global emissions but lack the policies and financial capacity to transition to a low-carbon future.
- While industrialized countries use results-based payments domestically, their subsidies for emissions reduction and carbon removal in developing countries fund investment rather than reward results.
- Competitive, results-based subsidies could complement existing funding streams, increase efficiency, and open access to subsidies to small- and medium-sized firms.
Weitere IDOS-Expert*innen zu diesem Thema
-
Aleksandrova, Mariya
Climate risk governance
-
Bambe, Bao-We-Wal
Finance
-
Berensmann, Kathrin
Wirtschaftswissenschaften
-
Dippel, Beatrice
Komparatistik
-
Donnelly, Aiveen
Politikwissenschaft
-
Ekoh, Susan S.
Umweltwissenschaft
-
Fasold, Maximilian
Politische Ökonomie
-
Goedeking, Nicholas
Vergleichende politische Ökonomie
-
Hagenström, Paul
Internationale Beziehungen
-
Haldenwang, Christian von
Politikwissenschaftler
-
Kativu, Saymore Ngonidzashe
Geographie
-
Lehmann, Ina
Politikwissenschaft
-
Malerba, Daniele
Ökonomie
-
Mathis, Okka Lou
Politikwissenschaftlerin
-
Mchowa, Chifundo
Entwicklungsökonomie
-
Rodríguez de Francisco, Jean Carlo
Ökologische Ökonomie
-
Schiller, Armin von
Politikwissenschaftler
-
Sommer, Christoph
Ökonom
-
Srigiri, Srinivasa Reddy
Agrarökonom
-
Wagner, Niklas
Klima- und Wissenssoziologie
-
Walle, Yabibal
Entwicklungsökonomie
-
Yi, HyunAh
Energie- und Umweltwissenschaften