Donors and domestic policy makers: two worlds in agricultural policy making?
Mockshell, Jonathan / Regina BirnerExterne Publikationen (2015)
in: Food Policy 55 (8), 1-14
In recent decades, many developing countries have moved from taxing their agricultural sector to subsidizing it, a phenomenon referred to as “overshooting”. Using Ghana and Uganda as case study countries, this study aims to contribute to explaining this phenomenon by examining the role of policy beliefs. The study is based on the Advocacy Coalition Framework and relies on discourse analysis as analytical method. In-depth interviews with policy actors in both countries served as empirical basis. A quantitative analysis of the transcripts was used to identify different discourse coalitions, and a qualitative analysis was conducted to examine the discourses and identify their underlying policy beliefs. The paper identified far-reaching differences in the agricultural policy beliefs between domestic policy makers and donors regarding the question: What does it actually take to develop small-holder agriculture? The evidence from this analysis highlights the role that divergent policy beliefs can play in influencing agricultural policy choices.
Weitere IDOS-Expert*innen zu diesem Thema
-
Baumann, Max-Otto
Politikwissenschaft
-
Büscher, Chris
Development studies / Political ecology
-
Dombrowsky, Ines
Ökonomin
-
Hackenesch, Christine
Politikwissenschaft
-
Herrfahrdt-Pähle, Elke
Volkswirtin
-
Hilbrich, Sören
Ökonomie
-
Hornidge, Anna-Katharina
Entwicklungs- und Wissenssoziologie
-
Janus, Heiner
Politikwissenschaft
-
Keijzer, Niels
Sozialwissenschaft
-
Koch, Svea
Sozialwissenschaft
-
Mathis, Okka Lou
Politikwissenschaftlerin
-
Schwachula, Anna
Soziologie
-
Srigiri, Srinivasa Reddy
Agrarökonom
-
Vogel, Johanna
Kulturwirtschaft
-
von Haaren, Paula
Entwicklungsökonomie
-
Wehrmann, Dorothea
Soziologie