Science-policy interfaces and sustainable development: institutionally bridging the knowledge–action gap
Velander, Sara / Niklas Wagner / Lisa Biber-FreudenbergerExterne Publikationen (2026)
In: Antje Brown / Sandra Gilgan (eds.), Rethinking Sustainability, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 469-503
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-13886-6_14
Open access
This chapter describes science-policy interfaces (SPIs) as an opportunity to support sustainable development by bridging the knowledge-action gap and fostering evidence-based policies. The biggest challenges of sustainable development presented and discussed in previous chapters, including climate change, biodiversity loss, environmental injustice, and pandemics, are growing increasingly complex and uncertain. It has long been argued that for public interventions, such as policies, to more effectively address such problems and enhance sustainable development, structured evidence-based advice is needed.
Based on examples and theoretical knowledge from the literature, the chapter demonstrates how SPIs have the potential to fill knowledge gaps and foster concerted action on complex sustainability problems, specifically related to the environmental dimensions of sustainable development. Examples of prominent SPIs at the global scale are the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), which we explore in depth later in the chapter.
The chapter also presents the scholarly discourse on the effectiveness of SPIs in brief, emphasising the importance of being aware of the benefits and limitations of SPIs and different models of formalised knowledge co-production. While many scholars advocate for a co-production model over a linear model, the literature agrees that there is no ‘one-size-fits-all’ solution for facilitating interactions and coordination between knowledge holders, policymakers, and other stakeholders to effectively enhance sustainable development and synergies between interventions. When talking about sustainable development, social-political contexts need to be considered because sustainability issues are inherently interlinked and political, as reiterated in previous chapters. This chapter emphasises that effective science-policy engagement requires a two-way, iterative knowledge exchange. This approach is essential for operationalising a co-production model that incorporates diverse perspectives and knowledge systems—an indispensable factor in addressing the complex, interlinked challenges of sustainable development. Building on the previous chapter’s exploration of the growing significance of science-policy interactions in sustainable development, we want to offer a behind-the-scenes perspective on the dynamics of major intergovernmental organisations shaping the science-policy interface.
Weitere IDOS-Expert*innen zu diesem Thema
-
Koch, Svea
Sozialwissenschaft
-
Mathis, Okka Lou
Politikwissenschaftlerin
-
Schwachula, Anna
Soziologie
-
Srigiri, Srinivasa Reddy
Agrarökonom
-
Vogel, Johanna
Kulturwirtschaft
-
von Haaren, Paula
Entwicklungsökonomie
-
Wehrmann, Dorothea
Soziologie