China and the World Bank: how contrasting development approaches affect the stability of African states

Gehring, Kai / Lennart Kaplan / Melvin H. L. Wong
External Publications (2019)

Williamsburg, VA: AidData at William & Mary (AidData Working Paper 87) (Online)


China’s development model challenges the approaches of traditional, Western donors like the World Bank. We argue that both aim at stability, but differ in the norms propagated to achieve that. Using fixed effects and IV estimations, we analyze a broad range of subnational stability measures in Africa. Aid by both the World Bank and China does not increase outright conflict nor any type of citizen protest, on average. Both even reduce outright conflict by governments against civilians. Still, Chinese aid is associated with more government repression and an increased acceptance of authoritarian norms, while World Bank projects strengthen democratic values.

About the author

Kaplan, Lennart



Further experts

Erforth, Benedikt

Political Science 

Fiedler, Charlotte

Political Scientist 

Furness, Mark

Political Science 

Grävingholt, Jörn

Political Scientist 

Gudibande, Rohan


Hilbrich, Sören


Kuhnt, Jana

Development Economist 

Martin-Shields, Charles

Political Science 

Mross, Karina

Political Science 

Ruppel, Samantha

Political Science 

Sommer, Christoph


Walle, Yabibal

Development Economics