It’s domestic politics, stupid! EU democracy promotion strategies meet African dominant party regimes
Hackenesch, ChristineExterne Publikationen (2015)
in: World Development 75/2015 (Special Issue: Political Conditionality and EU Foreign Aid), 85–96
Dominant party systems trigger controversy about how the EU should engage with them. The examples of Ethiopia and Rwanda show that the willingness of authoritarian governments to engage with the EU on democratic reforms varies widely. The paper argues that the type of challenge to regime survival that authoritarian governments face affects both their coercive strategies and their openness to engaging with the EU, giving the EU different entry points to support reforms. Yet, due to EU domestic factors and difficulties with ‘reading’ authoritarian regimes’ logic of political survival, the EU has problems making use of this dynamic.
Further IDOS experts
-
Baydag, Melis
Political Science
-
Bergmann, Julian
Political Science
-
Dang, Vy
Political Science
-
Erforth, Benedikt
Political Science
-
Fiedler, Charlotte
Political Scientist
-
Furness, Mark
Political Science
-
Grimm, Sven
Political Science
-
Gutheil, Lena
Cultural Anthropology
-
Keijzer, Niels
Social Science
-
Koch, Svea
Social Science
-
Leininger, Julia
Political Scientist
-
Li, Hangwei
Political Science
-
Lorch, Jasmin
Political Science
-
Löpelt, Sarah
International relations and Sustainability policy
-
Mross, Karina
Political Science
-
von Haaren, Paula
Development Economics
-
Wingens, Christopher
Political Science