National influence in global health governance: the case of the United Kingdom’s department for international development

Esser, Daniel E.
External Publications (2018)

in: Richard Parker, Jonathan García (eds.), Routledge Handbook on the Politics of Global Health, London: Routledge, 219-229

ISBN: 978-1-138-23859-6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315297255

This chapter provides a case-based neo-institutionalist interpretation of the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development's (DFID) influence on development assistant for health. It presents a brief overview of neo-institutionalist theory and then situates DFID in the context of global health governance. The chapter argues that DFID can be characterised as a norm entrepreneur not just broadly with regard to poverty reduction, but also more specifically in the area of global health. The ‘political structure’ within which DFID has been operating since 1997 was singled out in all interviews. Another informant also credited DFID’s in-house expertise with the department’s ability ‘to swim in the same sort of waters as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, perhaps to a higher degree than other official donors’. DFID’s strategic focus on systems rather than specific problems equally informed the department’s negotiations in the context of global health governance forums.

About the author

Esser, Daniel

Development Studies, Human Geography

Esser

Further experts

Bergmann, Julian

Political Science 

Dang, Vy

Political Science 

Erforth, Benedikt

Political Science 

Friesen, Ina

Political Science 

Furness, Mark

Political Science 

Grimm, Sven

Political Science 

Hackenesch, Christine

Political Science 

Keijzer, Niels

Social Science 

Koch, Svea

Social Science 

Löpelt, Sarah

International relations and Sustainability policy 

von Haaren, Paula

Development Economics