Neofunctionalism and EU external policy integration: the case of capacity building in support of security and development (CBSD)
Bergmann, JulianExternal Publications (2019)
in: Journal of European Public Policy 26(9), 1253-1272
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1526204
Information
Under the umbrella of Capacity Building in Support of Security and Development (CBSD), the EU provides equipment and infrastructure to the armed forces of partner countries. The 2017 reform of the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP) to implement CBSD represents a remarkable integrative step at the interface of EU security and development policy. This article explains the IcSP reform through a neofunctionalist lens. It argues that the extension of the Commission’s competences in EU security affairs can be explained by the interaction of functional and cultivated spillover pressures. Functional discrepancies between the CSDP framework and EU development policy created strong pressures for further integrative steps. Moreover, the Commission exerted strong pressures for adopting its proposal for implementing CBSD through the IcSP by drawing on a combination of strategic coalition-building, bargaining tactics and community framing. The case illustrates neofunctionalism’s potential to explain EU external policy integration.
Further IDOS experts
-
Baydag, Melis
Political Science
-
Dang, Vy
Political Science
-
Erforth, Benedikt
Political Science
-
Fiedler, Charlotte
Political Scientist
-
Furness, Mark
Political Science
-
Grimm, Sven
Political Science
-
Hackenesch, Christine
Political Science
-
Keijzer, Niels
Social Science
-
Koch, Svea
Social Science
-
Kuhnt, Jana
Development Economist
-
Lorch, Jasmin
Political Science
-
Löpelt, Sarah
International relations and Sustainability policy
-
Martin-Shields, Charles
Political Science
-
Mross, Karina
Political Science
-
von Haaren, Paula
Development Economics