Discussion Paper

Discussion Paper sind kurze wissenschaftliche Papiere, die konkrete und eng gefasste Themen behandeln. Wissenschaftler*innen des German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS) stellen darin Zwischenergebnisse von Forschungsprojekten, Thesen, Einschätzungen sowie politische Gutachten und andere praxisorientierte wissenschaftliche Arbeiten zur Diskussion. Die Papiere können kostenlos als PDF heruntergeladen oder zum Preis von 6,00 € bei der Publikationstelle per E-Mail oder postalisch bestellt werden.

Publikationensuche

Es wurden 449 Ergebnisse gefunden. Zeige Ergebnisse 131 bis 140 von 449.

  1. Capital flows to emerging market and developing economies: global liquidity and uncertainty versus country-specific pull factors
    Capital flows to emerging market and developing economies: global liquidity and uncertainty versus country-specific pull factors

    Belke, Ansgar / Ulrich Volz (2018)
    Discussion Paper, 23/2018

    This study empirically analyses the push- and pull factors of different types of capital flows to emerging market and developing economies, with a particular focus on the role of economic policy uncertainty and global liquidity.

  2. Shaping the patterns of aid allocation: a comparative analysis of seven bilateral donors and the European Union
    Shaping the patterns of aid allocation: a comparative analysis of seven bilateral donors and the European Union

    Baydag, Rena Melis / Stephan Klingebiel / Paul Marschall (2018)
    Discussion Paper, 22/2018

    Partner country selection is one of the key elements of development policy. Here, approaches of selected OECD member countries during the last years, their principles in development policy making and how their approach is reflected in the formula applied, are analysed.

  3. Incentivising and regulating multi-actor partnerships and private-sector engagement in development cooperation
    Incentivising and regulating multi-actor partnerships and private-sector engagement in development cooperation

    Wehrmann, Dorothea (2018)
    Discussion Paper, 21/2018

    The inclusion of actors from the private sector is a central challenge in development co-operation. This study investigates how multi-actor partnerships and multi-stakeholder networks can provide a supporting structure in this regard.

  4. Coordination: the key to governing the water-land-food nexus in Zambia?
    Coordination: the key to governing the water-land-food nexus in Zambia?

    Scheumann, Waltina / George Phiri (2018)
    Discussion Paper, 20/2018

    The study analyses coordination issues. It argues that cross-sectoral coordination is not the only governance issue to be solved to harmonise land and water-intensive development plans. Key are land tenure changes and the water allocation regime vis-a-vis traditional governance institutions.

  5. The interface between research and policy-making in South Africa: exploring the institutional framework and practice of an uneasy relationship
    The interface between research and policy-making in South Africa: exploring the institutional framework and practice of an uneasy relationship

    Grimm, Sven / Mareike Magdalena Gensch / Johanna Hauf / Julia Prenzel / Nitja Rehani / Sarah Senz / Olivier Vogel (2018)
    Discussion Paper, 19/2018

    The interface between research and policy-making is gaining relevance, as complexities in global challenges increase. This paper explores the science-policy-interface in South Africa, based on more than 100 interviews. It examines the incentives and provides recommendations for academia and policy-makers.

  6. Mobilising capital for sustainable infrastructure: the cases of AIIB and NDB
    Mobilising capital for sustainable infrastructure: the cases of AIIB and NDB

    Griffith-Jones, Stephany / Samuel Leistner (2018)
    Discussion Paper, 18/2018

    This discussion paper examines how private capital can be mobilised for sustainable infrastructure, with particular reference to the newly created Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) and the New Development Bank (NDB), also known as the BRICS Bank.

  7. Is the sectoral aid allocation within countries need-oriented?
    Is the sectoral aid allocation within countries need-oriented?

    Eger, Jens / Hannes Öhler / Alexandra Rudolph (2018)
    Discussion Paper, 17/2018

    The paper focuses on an important dimension of donors' aid allocations that has largely been neglected in the empirical literature: the need orientation of donors when deciding on the sectoral composition of their recipient country portfolios.

  8. Assessing the impact of governance programmes: GIZ support to citizen participation in local governance in Benin
    Assessing the impact of governance programmes: GIZ support to citizen participation in local governance in Benin

    Groß, Lisa (2018)
    Discussion Paper, 16/2018

    How can we assess impact in governance programmes? This publication provides an exemplary impact assessment of a decentralisation programme in Benin. It analyses whether and how support to citizen participation contributes to the quality of public services and local governance at local level.

  9. Die Struktur der deutschen öffentlichen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit: Hintergründe, Trends und Implikationen für das BMZ und andere Bundesressorts
    Die Struktur der deutschen öffentlichen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit: Hintergründe, Trends und Implikationen für das BMZ und andere Bundesressorts

    Bohnet, Michael / Stephan Klingebiel / Paul Marschall (2018)
    Discussion Paper, 15/2018

    Die Struktur der deutschen öffentlichen Entwicklungsleistungen (ODA) ist im Umbruch. Es sind deutliche Veränderungen mit Blick auf Höhe, Umfang und Muster erkennbar. Dieser Beitrag skizziert die Trends im Detail, liefert kritische Reflexionen und gibt dazu mögliche strategische Interpretationen.

  10. Enabling factors for cooperation in the climate negotiations: a comparative analysis of Copenhagen 2009 and Paris 2015
    Enabling factors for cooperation in the climate negotiations: a comparative analysis of Copenhagen 2009 and Paris 2015

    Högl, Maximilian (2018)
    Discussion Paper, 14/2018

    Humans are able to solve common pool resource problems according to interdisciplinary research. But does this apply to international relations also? This paper paper examines this question by comparing two major climate summits, thereby providing insights into how the Paris Agreement was negotiated.