Do greener trade agreements call for side-payments?
Brandi, Clara / Jean-Frédéric Morin / Stender, FrederikExternal Publications (2022)
in: Journal of Environment and Development 31 (2), 111-138
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965221076070
Open access
Preferential trade agreements (PTAs) increasingly include environmental provisions. While the existing literature documents these provisions’ environmental impacts, this paper sheds light on their relation with aid flows. Using an event-specification and data on bilateral Official Development Assistance (ODA) commitments for a sample of 147 developing country recipients in the period from 2002 to 2017, we find evidence that the number of environmental provisions in PTAs is positively associated with aid during negotiation phases. With high-income countries typically pre-determining the extent of environmental provisions in their upcoming PTAs, this suggests that aid serves as a side-payment for recipients to sweeten the pot and agree upon already formulated PTA content. While both aggregate ODA and its subcomponent environmental aid a priori qualify as candidates for pre-signature side-payments, we find that only the former fulfills this expectation, presumably reflecting more leeway to exploit aid fungibility.
Further IDOS experts
-
Aleksandrova, Mariya
Climate risk governance
-
Banerjee, Aparajita
Environmental and Resource Sociology, Public Policy
-
Berger, Axel
Political Science
-
Dombrowsky, Ines
Economist
-
Hagenström, Paul
International Relations
-
Hein, Jonas
Geography
-
Hernandez, Ariel
Economy
-
Houdret, Annabelle
Political Scientist
-
Kornher, Lukas
Economics
- Kötter, Elizabeth Chepkemboi
-
Lehmann, Ina
Political Science
-
Möschl, Tim
Governance
-
Olekseyuk, Zoryana
Economy
-
Putz, Lena-Marie
Peace and Conflict Research
-
Rodríguez de Francisco, Jean Carlo
Ecological economics
-
Siriwardane-de Zoysa, Rapti
Sociology
-
Vogel, Tim
Economy