Using trade provisions to make environmental agreements more dynamic
Morin, Jean-Frédéric / Noémie Laurens / Clara Brandi / Jakob SchwabExterne Publikationen (2025)
in: International Studies Quarterly 69 (1), sqaf010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaf010
Open access
This article examines the impact of trade provisions on treaty dynamism. It differentiates between static treaties, which remain unaltered, and dynamic treaties, which generate new commitments, either by bringing about additional rules or attracting new parties. We argue that incorporating trade provisions into multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) enhances their dynamism. Such provisions can empower interest groups to advocate for new international commitments and can prompt businesses in non-party states to pressure their governments to join the MEA. Analyzing a dataset of 647 MEAs, we find that provisions that restrict trade flows are associated with higher numbers of amendments and accessions. This insight is crucial for resolving the so-called “ambition/participation dilemma” and designing more adaptable treaties, particularly at a time when there is increasing enthusiasm for using trade measures to set up international climate clubs.
Further IDOS experts
-
Aleksandrova, Mariya
Climate risk governance
-
Banerjee, Aparajita
Environmental and Resource Sociology, Public Policy
-
Berger, Axel
Political Science
-
Dombrowsky, Ines
Economist
-
Hagenström, Paul
International Relations
-
Hein, Jonas
Geography
-
Hernandez, Ariel
Economy
-
Houdret, Annabelle
Political Scientist
-
Kornher, Lukas
Economics
- Kötter, Elizabeth Chepkemboi
-
Lehmann, Ina
Political Science
-
Möschl, Tim
Governance
-
Olekseyuk, Zoryana
Economy
-
Putz, Lena-Marie
Peace and Conflict Research
-
Rodríguez de Francisco, Jean Carlo
Ecological economics
-
Siriwardane-de Zoysa, Rapti
Sociology
-
Stender, Frederik
Economics
-
Vogel, Tim
Economy