2 superpowers, 1 playbook: Why Chinese and US bureaucrats think and act alike
Esser, Daniel / Heiner Janus / Theisen, Mark / Tim Hailer-RöthelExterne Publikationen (2025)
published on theconversation.com, 16.12.2025
DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.64628/AAI.sjunpp3ed
Volltext/Full text
Despite strategic rivalry, bureaucratic behavior in China and the United States follows strikingly similar logics. Drawing on comparative research across foreign aid, environmental governance, and pandemic response, we show that Chinese and U.S. bureaucrats are often driven by strikingly similar incentives. Career pressures, blame avoidance, political signaling, and risk aversion shape day-to-day decision-making on both sides — frequently producing comparable outcomes, despite very different political systems. Understanding these shared bureaucratic dynamics helps explain why the two superpowers can appear deeply polarized politically, yet are surprisingly predictable in practice. Beneath geopolitical rivalry, common administrative logics continue to anchor state action.
Weitere IDOS-Expert*innen zu diesem Thema
-
Baumann, Max-Otto
Politikwissenschaft
-
Baydag, Melis
Politikwissenschaft
-
Berger, Axel
Politikwissenschaft
-
Bergmann, Julian
Politikwissenschaft
-
Dang, Vy
Politikwissenschaft
-
Erforth, Benedikt
Politikwissenschaft
-
Goedeking, Nicholas
Vergleichende politische Ökonomie
-
Grimm, Sven
Politologie
-
Hackenesch, Christine
Politikwissenschaft
-
Haug, Sebastian
Politikwissenschaft
-
Hilbrich, Sören
Ökonomie
-
Kachelmann, Matthias
Politikwissenschaft
-
Keijzer, Niels
Sozialwissenschaft
-
Klingebiel, Stephan
Politikwissenschaft
-
Koch, Svea
Sozialwissenschaft
-
Li, Hangwei
Politikwissenschaft
-
Löpelt, Sarah
Internationale Beziehungen und Nachhaltigkeitspolitik
-
Morare, Ditebogo Modiegi
Politikwissenschaften
-
Novoselova, Anna
Politikwissenschaften
-
Olekseyuk, Zoryana
Ökonomie
-
Reiners, Wulf
Politikwissenschaft
-
von Haaren, Paula
Entwicklungsökonomie
-
Wingens, Christopher
Politikwissenschaftler