Same table, different menus? A comparison of UN and EU mediation practice in the Kosovo-Serbia conflict
Bergmann, JulianExterne Publikationen (2018)
in: International Negotiation 23 (2), 238-257
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-23021156
Information
This article compares UN and EU mediation practice in the Kosovo-Serbia conflict. It proposes a conceptual framework to analyze mediation effectiveness and its conditions and applies it to the UN-led Kosovo Status Talks in Vienna (2006–2007) and the ongoing EU-facilitated dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina (since 2011). The EU’s relatively high degree of effectiveness compared to the UN effort can be partly explained by the application of a strategy of "manipulation", drawing on the EU’s strong leverage vis-à-vis both sides; partly by pointing to the conflict context which has been more favorable to mediation since 2011. At the same time, the analysis reveals that EU mediation has not led to any changes concerning Serbia’s stance toward the recognition of Kosovo’s independence. The continuing non-resolution of the conflict demonstrates the limits of the EU’s mediation approach and points to a substantial dilemma of EU mediation.
Weitere IDOS-Expert*innen zu diesem Thema
-
Baumann, Max-Otto
Politikwissenschaft
-
Baydag, Melis
Politikwissenschaft
-
Dang, Vy
Politikwissenschaft
-
Erforth, Benedikt
Politikwissenschaft
-
Fiedler, Charlotte
Politikwissenschaftlerin
-
Hackenesch, Christine
Politikwissenschaft
-
Janus, Heiner
Politikwissenschaft
-
Keijzer, Niels
Sozialwissenschaft
-
Koch, Svea
Sozialwissenschaft
-
Kuhnt, Jana
Entwicklungsökonomin
-
Leininger, Julia
Politikwissenschaftlerin
-
Lorch, Jasmin
Politikwissenschaft
-
Löpelt, Sarah
Internationale Beziehungen und Nachhaltigkeitspolitik
-
Mross, Karina
Politikwissenschaftlerin
-
Olekseyuk, Zoryana
Ökonomie
-
von Haaren, Paula
Entwicklungsökonomie