Same table, different menus? A comparison of UN and EU mediation practice in the Kosovo-Serbia conflict
Bergmann, JulianExterne Publikationen (2018)
in: International Negotiation 23 (2), 238-257
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-23021156
Information
This article compares UN and EU mediation practice in the Kosovo-Serbia conflict. It proposes a conceptual framework to analyze mediation effectiveness and its conditions and applies it to the UN-led Kosovo Status Talks in Vienna (2006–2007) and the ongoing EU-facilitated dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina (since 2011). The EU’s relatively high degree of effectiveness compared to the UN effort can be partly explained by the application of a strategy of "manipulation", drawing on the EU’s strong leverage vis-à-vis both sides; partly by pointing to the conflict context which has been more favorable to mediation since 2011. At the same time, the analysis reveals that EU mediation has not led to any changes concerning Serbia’s stance toward the recognition of Kosovo’s independence. The continuing non-resolution of the conflict demonstrates the limits of the EU’s mediation approach and points to a substantial dilemma of EU mediation.
Further IDOS experts
-
Baydag, Melis
Political Science
-
Dang, Vy
Political Science
-
Erforth, Benedikt
Political Science
-
Fiedler, Charlotte
Political Scientist
-
Furness, Mark
Political Science
-
Grimm, Sven
Political Science
-
Hackenesch, Christine
Political Science
-
Keijzer, Niels
Social Science
-
Koch, Svea
Social Science
-
Kuhnt, Jana
Development Economist
-
Lorch, Jasmin
Political Science
-
Löpelt, Sarah
International relations and Sustainability policy
-
Martin-Shields, Charles
Political Science
-
Mross, Karina
Political Science
-
von Haaren, Paula
Development Economics