Behaviour matters: improving energy efficiency in informal settlements
Figueroa, AureliaBriefing Paper (7/2016)
Bonn: German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)
By 2022, two billion people will be living in informal settlements according to the United Nations. Although per capita energy consumption in informal settlements is comparatively low, the benefits of energy efficiency uptake – enhanced energy system sustainability, economic development, social development, environmental sustainability, and increased prosperity (International Energy Agency [IEA], 2014) – stand to equally benefit these communities. Yet despite these benefits, informal settlement households – as so many others – have been slow in taking up energy-efficient technologies. This can be partly attributed to behavioural barriers: Consumers often do not invest in energy efficiency in an economically rational manner. Recent research findings point to effective means of implementing behavioural insights for energy efficiency in informal settlements. Building upon this precedence, governments, international organisations and implementing agencies should en¬courage the application of potentially low-cost behavioural insights to energy efficiency initiatives in informal settlements to improve intervention efficacy. It is easy for energy efficiency to be lost in the challenging demands of daily life in informal settlements – sourcing water, managing irregular employment opportunities, or basic health and safety concerns, compounded by risk aversion and the discounting of future-based benefits. This is why it is essential to integrate behavioural insights to facilitate energy-efficiency uptake. This may be done, for example, by making information on energy efficiency simple and meaningful, by focussing on context-specific benefits, by bringing the economic benefit of uptake closer to the consumer while spacing the cost over time, or by appealing to social norms.
While most evidence on the importance of behavioural insights for energy efficiency stems from the OECD member country context, the topic is equally relevant in the developing country informal settlement context. Here, the cost-benefit analysis of energy efficiency is further complicated by the fact that many households informally consume electricity without paying for it or by paying a flat rate. This presumably removes the traditional pecuniary motivation – electrical bill savings – upon which to influence energy-efficiency implementation. What entry points then exist for energy-efficient products which invariably have a higher upfront purchase cost when there are – prima facie – no financial benefits to be realised? The higher durability of energy-efficient products in the context of the instable electricity supply occurring in many developing countries could be an obscured benefit. It accrues not just at the societal level but also at the individual level, further building the economic case for energy-efficiency uptake.
Further IDOS experts
-
Aleksandrova, Mariya
Climate risk governance
-
Banerjee, Aparajita
Environmental and Resource Sociology, Public Policy
-
Baydag, Melis
Political Science
-
Bergmann, Julian
Political Science
-
Brandi, Clara
Economy and Political Science
-
Büscher, Chris
Development studies / Political ecology
-
Dang, Vy
Political Science
-
Dippel, Beatrice
Comparatist
-
Donnelly, Aiveen
Politcal Science
-
Ekoh, Susan S.
Environmental Research
-
Erforth, Benedikt
Political Science
-
Fiedler, Charlotte
Political Scientist
-
Fuhrmann-Riebel, Hanna
Economy
-
Furness, Mark
Political Science
-
Goedeking, Nicholas
Comparative Political Economy
-
Grimm, Sven
Political Science
-
Gutheil, Lena
Cultural Anthropology
-
Hackenesch, Christine
Political Science
-
Hagenström, Paul
International Relations
-
Kativu, Saymore Ngonidzashe
Geography
-
Keijzer, Niels
Social Science
-
Koch, Svea
Social Science
-
Lehmann, Ina
Political Science
-
Leininger, Julia
Political Scientist
-
Li, Hangwei
Political Science
-
Lorch, Jasmin
Political Science
-
Löpelt, Sarah
International relations and Sustainability policy
-
Malerba, Daniele
Economy
-
Mathis, Okka Lou
Political Scientist
-
Mross, Karina
Political Science
-
Never, Babette
Political Scientist
-
Pegels, Anna
Economist
-
Rodríguez de Francisco, Jean Carlo
Ecological economics
-
Srigiri, Srinivasa Reddy
Agricultural Economist
-
von Haaren, Paula
Development Economics
-
Wagner, Niklas
Climate & Knowledge Sociology
-
Wende, Paulina
Political Science
-
Wingens, Christopher
Political Science
-
Yi, HyunAh
Energy and Environmental Policy